Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act 2016 and international law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2017.305Abstract
The article analyses the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, adopted by the US Congress in 2016, and his compliance to the rules of international law. This Act allows US citizens to sue foreign states which have helped to commit an international terrorist act on US territory in US courts. This rule contradicts the norms of international law, according to which foreign states and their property have immunity in the courts of other states. According to the author, now with the refusal of the US to respect the immunity of other states, the US itself should not enjoy immunity in the courts of other states if it should commit an act of a terrorist character. But the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act does not touch state immunity, concerning the damage inflicted during military conflicts, and so US armed forces continue to enjoy this immunity. According to the author judgments that may be delivered according to this Act would be executed only on the US territory. It is improbable that such judgments would be executed by another states. In the author’s opinion, the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act may violate the complex balance of international relations and only time can show — will it bring more benefits than harm to the US and their citizens. Refs 8.
Keywords:
international law, international immunities of state, international terrorism, US legislation
Downloads
References
References
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.