Official information on sulfur dioxide emissions and its assessment using satellite remote sensing data

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.417

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to assess the openness, availability and reliability of official information on sulfur dioxide emissions from 31 of the largest point anthropogenic sources located in Russia. For the assessment, a comparison was made of the amounts of emissions according to official reporting and remote sensing data. The set of reported data was formed using information from websites of Federal State Statistic Service and of Federal Service for Supervision of Natural Resources, as well as those contained in state reports on the ecological situation and on environmental protection or in public non-financial statements of large companies. Remote sensing dataset was downloaded from NASA Global Sulfur Dioxide Monitoring project website. Data comparison was carried out using statistical analysis methods. It is found that remote sensing data can be considered a standard of information openness and availability, while reported data is incomplete and requires significant efforts to collect. For the emissions up to 50 000 tons per year, the differences between the reported and remote sensing data can be explained solely by the uncertainty of satellite measures. With a larger amount, however, the remote sensing values are in general larger than reported ones, which may indicate imperfect systems of emission control from stationary sources, the presence of many unaccounted sources, or deliberate distortion of environmental information. Emission catalogues from satellite data can become an alternative and supplement to official reporting, as well as be used for control and surveillance activities and bringing to legal responsibility. Topical issues are publishing official environmental information in a form of open data, the development of mechanisms for public non-financial reporting of large companies, the study of the links between information transparency and reliability of the information, as well as the peculiarities of the formation of official reporting about environmental impact.

Keywords:

official ecological information, right for information, openness of information, availability of information, reliability of inrofmation, remote sensing of environment, air pollution, sulphur dioxide, space monitoring

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Бахарев, Алексей В., Екатерина В. Ходырева, Лаура Н. Богданова. 2009. «Латентная преступность в сфере незаконных рубок лесных насаждений». Вестник Академии Генеральной прокуратуры Российской Федерации 5 (13): 44–46.

Васильева, Мария А., Константин В. Степанюгин, Александр В. Богданов. 2015. «Выявление нарушений лесного законодательства с использованием систем дистанционного мониторинга на территории Дальневосточного федерального округа». Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета МВД России 4 (68): 107–111.

Дамм, Ирина А., Ольга В. Роньжина, Евгений А. Акунченко, Маргарита А. Волкова, Андрей В. Корхов. 2018. «Открытость и доступность информации о правотворческой деятельности органов местного самоуправления в Российской Федерации». Российский юридический журнал 6 (123): 85–97.

Зуев, Дмитрий В., Валентин Б. Кашкин, Константин В. Симонов. 2018. «Использование спутниковых методов мониторинга для оценки экологического состояния северных территорий Красноярского края». Успехи современного естествознания 2: 86–92.

Кисилева, Евгения В., Жан К. Загидуллин, Алексей В. Журавлев. 2021. Корпоративное управление в контексте ESG: новое понимание устойчивости. Дата обращения 5 мая, 2022. http://corptransparency.ru/documents/corporate-governance-in-the-context-of-esg.pdf.

Мельникова, Валентина Г. 2017. «Открытые данные в механизме реализации права граждан на достоверную информация о состоянии окружающей среды». Вестник Томского государственного университета. Право 23: 124–130. https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/23/14

Мисник, Галина А. 2007. «Право на доступ к экологической информации». Журнал российского права 2: 83–92.

Розов, Сергей Ю., Нина Д. Кутузова, Татьяна Н. Большова. 2019. «Опыт применения данных дистанционного зондирования Земли при производстве судебных экологических экспертиз». Теория и практика судебной экспертизы 14: 56–65. https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-1-56-65

Сергеева, Ольга С. 2019. «Применение геоинформационных технологий для повышения эффективности земельного надзора». Географический вестник 4 (51): 154–162.

Терещенко, Людмила К. 2010. «Доступ к информации: правовые гарантии». Журнал российского права 10: 46–53.

Ускова, Марина С. 2017. «Современные технологии космического мониторинга как способ совершенствования правового регулирования договора страхования урожая сельскохозяйственных культур, осуществляемого с государственной поддержкой». Ученые труды Российской академии адвокатуры и нотариата 4 (47): 123–127.

Ускова, Марина С. 2018. «Инновационное обеспечение «прозрачности» сельскохозяйственного страхования в России и за рубежом». Legal Concept = Правовая парадигма 4: 45–52. https://doi.org/10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2018.4.6

Fioletov, Vitali E., Chris A. McLinden, Nickolay Krotkov, Can Li, Joanna Joiner, Nicolas Theys, Simon Carn, Mike D. Moran. 2016. “A global catalogue of large SO2 sources and emissions derived from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument”. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 16 (18): 11497–11519. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11497-2016

Li, Can, Qiang Zhang, Nickolay A. Krotkov, David G. Streets, Kebin He, Si-Chee Tsay, James F. Gleason. 2010. “Recent large reduction in sulfur dioxide emissions from Chinese power plants observed by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument”. Geophysical Research Letters 37 (8): 1–6. Дата обращения 13 июля,2022. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl042594

Liu, Fei, Sungyeon Choi, Can Li, Vitali E. Fioletov, Chris A. McLinden, Joanna Joiner, Nickolay A. Krotkov, Huisheng Bian, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Anton S. Darmenov, Arlindo M. da Silva. 2018. “A new global anthropogenic SO2 emission inventory for the last decade: A mosaic of satellite-derived and bottom-up emissions”. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 18: 16571–16586. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16571-2018

Streets, David G., Timothy Canty, Gregory R. Carmichael, Benjamin de Foy, Russell R. Dickerson, Bryan N. Duncan, David P. Edwards, John A. Haynes, Daven K. Henze, Marc R. Houyoux, Daniel J. Jacob, Nickolay A. Krotkov, Lok N. Lamsal, Yang Liu. Zifeng Lu, Randall V. Martin, Gabriele G. Pfister, Robert W. Pinder, Ross J. Salawitch, Kevin J. Wecht. 2013. “Emissions estimation from satellite retrievals: A review of current capability”. Atmospheric Environment 77: 1011–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.051

Vaughn, Timothy L., Clay S. Bell, Cody K. Pickering, Stefan Schwietzke, Garvin A. Heath, Gabrielle Pétron, Daniel J. Zimmerle, Russell C. Schnell, Dag Nummedal. 2018. “Temporal variability largely explains top-down/bottom-up difference in methane emission estimates from a natural gas production region”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (46): 11712–11717. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805687115

References

Bakharev, Aleksei V., Ekaterina V. Khodyreva, Laura N. Bogdanova. 2009. “Latent crime in the sphere of illegal felling of forestation”. Vestnik Akademii General’noi prokuratury Rossiiskoi Federatsii 5 (13): 44–46. (In Russian)

Damm, Irina A., Olga V. Ronzhina, Evgenii A. Akunchenko, Margarita A. Volkova, Andrei V. Korkhov. 2018. “Openness and free access to information about the legal activities of local governments in the Russian Federation”. Rossiiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal 6 (123): 85–97. (In Russian)

Fioletov, Vitali E., Chris A. McLinden, Nickolay Krotkov, Can Li, Joanna Joiner, Nicolas Theys, Simon Carn, Mike D. Moran. 2016. “A global catalogue of large SO2 sources and emissions derived from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument”. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 16 (18): 11497–11519. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11497-2016

Kisileva, Evgeniia V., Zhan K. Zagidullin, Aleksei V. Zhuravlev. 2021. Corporate governance in ESG context: New understanding of sustainability. Accessed May 5, 2022. http://corptransparency.ru/documents/corporate-governance-in-the-context-of-esg.pdf. (In Russian)

Li, Can, Qiang Zhang, Nickolay A. Krotkov, David G. Streets, Kebin He, Si-Chee Tsay, James F. Gleason. 2010. “Recent large reduction in sulfur dioxide emissions from Chinese power plants observed by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument”. Geophysical Research Letters 37 (8): 1–6. Accessed July 13, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl042594

Liu, Fei, Sungyeon Choi, Can Li, Vitali E. Fioletov, Chris A. McLinden, Joanna Joiner, Nickolay A. Krotkov, Huisheng Bian, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Anton S. Darmenov, Arlindo M. da Silva. 2018. “A new global anthropogenic SO2 emission inventory for the last decade: A mosaic of satellite-derived and bottom-up emissions”. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 18: 16571–16586. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16571-2018

Melnikova, Valentina G. 2017. “Open source data in the mechanism for implementing the right of citizens to true information about the environmental conditions”. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo 23: 124–130. https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/23/14 (In Russian)

Misnik, Galina A. 2007. “Right to access to the ecological information”. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava 2: 83–92.(In Russian)

Rozov, Sergei Yu., Nina D. Kutuzova, Tat’yana N. Bolysheva. 2019. “Experience of applying remote sensing Earth data in environmental forensics”. Teoriia i praktika sudebnoi ekspertizy 14: 56–65. https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-1-56-65 (In Russian)

Sergeeva, Olga S. 2019. “The application of geo-information technologies to increase the effectiveness of land supervision”. Geograficheskii vestnik 4 (51): 154–162. (In Russian)

Streets, David G., Timothy Canty, Gregory R. Carmichael, Benjamin de Foy, Russell R. Dickerson, Bryan N. Duncan, David P. Edwards, John A. Haynes, Daven K. Henze, Marc R. Houyoux, Daniel J. Jacob, Nickolay A. Krotkov, Lok N. Lamsal, Yang Liu. Zifeng Lu, Randall V. Martin, Gabriele G. Pfister, Robert W. Pinder, Ross J. Salawitch, Kevin J. Wecht. 2013. “Emissions estimation from satellite retrievals: A review of current capability”. Atmospheric Environment 77: 1011–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.051

Tereshchenko, Liudmila K. 2010. “Access to the information: Legal guarantees”. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava 10: 46–53. (In Russian)

Uskova, Marina S. 2017. “Modern technologies of space monitoring as a way to improve the legal regulation of an insurance contract for agricultural crops, carried out with state support”. Uchenye trudy Rossiiskoi akademii advokatury i notariata 4 (47): 123–127. (In Russian)

Uskova, Marina S. 2018. “The innovative way to ensure transparency of agricultural insurance in Russia and abroad”. Legal Concept = Pravovaia paradigma 4: 45–52. https://doi.org/10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2018.4.6(In Russian)

Vasilyeva, Mariia A., Konstantin V. Stepanyugin, Aleksandr V. Bogdanov. 2015. “Identification of violations of forestlegislation using remote monitoring systems in the Far Eastern Federal District”. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii 4 (68): 107–111. (In Russian)

Vaughn, Timothy L., Clay S. Bell, Cody K. Pickering, Stefan Schwietzke, Garvin A. Heath, Gabrielle Pétron, Daniel J. Zimmerle, Russell C. Schnell, Dag Nummedal. 2018. “Temporal variability largely explains top-down/bottom-up difference in methane emission estimates from a natural gas production region”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (46): 11712–11717. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805687115

Zuev, Dmitrii V., Valentin B. Kashkin, Konstantin V. Simonov. 2018. “The using satellite methods of monitoring for estimation of environmental state of northern territories of the Krasnoyarsk region”. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniia 2: 86–92. (In Russian)

Published

2022-12-15

How to Cite

Syomin, P. O. (2022). Official information on sulfur dioxide emissions and its assessment using satellite remote sensing data. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 13(4), 1111–1133. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.417

Issue

Section

Legal Life: Scientific-Practical Conclusions, Comments and Reviews