The right to rehabilitation in the context of the right to enforce a court decision.

Authors

  • Tatiyna M. Alexeeva St. Petersburg State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.103

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to study the right to compensation for harm caused to a rehabilitated person in the context of the principle of enforceability of a court decision and the time frame for revising judicial acts provided for by the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.

The right to rehabilitation is considered in its relation to the right to a legally established amount of compensation for harm caused. The author proves that the principle of enforceability of court decisions on payments to the rehabilitated is the most important guarantee, without which the right to rehabilitation itself becomes illusory. In addition, the existence in the criminal procedural legislation of the Russian Federation of limits limiting in time the possibility of revising court decisions on payments to the rehabilitated should serve as one of the main ways to ensure this right.

As a result of this study, the author came to the following conclusions. An integral part of the right to rehabilitation in the framework of the criminal procedure of the Russian Federation is the amount of harm caused to the rehabilitated person - the material aspect of this right. At the same time, the right to the declared amount of property and moral damage is not absolute. When canceling or changing court decisions that have entered into legal force, especially in exceptional proceedings, strict adherence to the principle of legal certainty is required, an integral part of which is the right to enforceability of a court decision. According to the author, it is necessary to establish a specific period during which the court of cassation is competent to make a decision if it worsens the situation of the rehabilitated person. It seems to the author that such a period may be equal to six months.

Keywords:

criminal proceedings, rehabilitation, harm’s amount, a court decision’s enforceability; reasonable time, European Court, cassation instance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Алексеева, Татьяна М. 2016. Правовая определенность судебных решений в уголовном судопроизводстве: понятие, значение и пределы. М.: Юрлитинформ.

Блауберг, Игорь В., Игорь К. Пантин. 1979. Краткий словарь по философии. М.: Политиздат.

Долгиева, Мадина М. 2021. «Легализация криптовалюты: судебная практика». Законность 3: 50–54.

Коршунов, Артем В. 2017. «Вопросы реабилитации в уголовном процессе России». Научный портал МВД России 1: 29–32.

Морщакова, Тамара Г., ред. 2012. Стандарты справедливого правосудия (международные и национальные практики) . М.: Мысль.

Низамов, Вячеслав Ю. 2016. «Институт реабилитации в уголовном процессе: проблемы применения и перспективы развития». Ленинградский юридический журнал 3 (45): 213–222.

Петрухин, Игорь Л. 2009. Оправдательный приговор и право на реабилитацию. М.: Проспект. Дата обращения 6 апреля, 2023. https://royallib.com/read/petruhin_i/opravdatelniy_prigovor_i_pravo_na_reabilitatsiyu_monografiya.html#61440.

Попов, Валерий С. 2012a. «Реабилитация в уголовном процессе: о ее сущности и содержании». Бизнес в законе. Экономико-юридический журнал 4: 35–39.

Попов, Валерий С. 2012b. «Уголовно-правовая реабилитация или возмещение вреда, незаконно причиненного органами, осуществлявшими производство по уголовному делу». Пробелы в российском законодательстве 1: 189–193.

Ситник, Александр А. 2020. «Цифровые валюты: проблемы правового регулирования». Актуальные проблемы российского права 11: 103–113.

Хайдаров, Альберт А. 2020. «Реабилитация в уголовном процессе: парадоксы практики». Законность 3: 62–64.

Часовникова, Ольга Г. 2020. «Реабилитация и иное возмещение вреда в уголовном процессе». Журнал правовых и экономических исследований 4: 159–162.

References

Alekseeva, Tatiyna M. 2016. Legal certainty of judicial decisions in criminal proceedings: Concept, meaning and limits. Moscow, Iurlitinform Publ. (In Russian)

Blauberg, Igor’ V., Igor’ K. Pantin. 1979. A short dictionary of philosophy. Moscow, Politizdat Publ. (In Russian)

Chasovnikova, Ol’ga G. 2020. “Rehabilitation and other compensation for harm in criminal proceedings”. Zhurnal pravovykh i ekonomicheskikh issledovanii 4: 159–162. (In Russian)

Dolgieva, Madina M. 2021. “Cryptocurrency legalization: Judicial practice”. Zakonnost’ 3: 50–54. (In Russian)

Khaidarov, Al’bert A. 2020. “Rehabilitation in criminal proceedings: paradoxes of practice”. Zakonnost’ 3: 62–64. (In Russian)

Korshunov, Artem V. 2017. “Issues of rehabilitation in the criminal process of Russia”. Nauchnyi portal MVD Rossii 1: 29–32. (In Russian)

Morshchakova, Tamara G. ed. 2012. Fair justice standards (international and national practices) . Moscow, Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

Nizamov, Viacheslav Iu. 2016. “Institute of rehabilitation in criminal proceedings: Problems of application and prospects of development”. Leningradskii iuridicheskii zhurnal 3 (45): 213–222. (In Russian)

Petrukhin, Igor’ L. 2009. Acquittal and the right to rehabilitation. Moscow, Prospekt Publ. Accessed April 6, 2023. https://royallib.com/read/petruhin_i/opravdatelniy_prigovor_i_pravo_na_reabilitatsiyu_monografiya.html 61440. (In Russian)

Popov, Valerii S. 2012a. “Rehabilitation in criminal proceedings: About its essence and content”. Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-iuridicheskii zhurnal 4: 35–39. (In Russian)

Popov, Valerii S. 2012b. “Criminal-legal rehabilitation or compensation for damage unlawfully caused by the bodies that carried out the proceedings in a criminal case”. Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel’stve 1: 189–193. (In Russian)

Sitnik, Aleksandr A. 2020. “Digital currencies: Problems of legal regulation”. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava 11: 103–113. (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2024-03-28

How to Cite

Alexeeva, T. M. (2024). The right to rehabilitation in the context of the right to enforce a court decision. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 15(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.103

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024)

Section

Public and Private Law: Applied Research

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.