Concept and special features of proving in notarial activities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.107

Abstract

The article examines some problems related to proof in notarial activities and substantiates the relevance of those provisions of legislation for strengthening the role of the notary in the process of proof by introducing categories of limits and standards in notarial activities. The establishment of limits of notarial proof increases the meaning of certain clauses of the agreement (what exactly was checked and proved by the notary) and serves as the basis for an adequate solution to the issue of evidentiary value of the notarial deed, reflecting the results of the explanatory and verification activities of the notary. In the subject of proof in notarial proceedings, it is proposed to include documents, information, and statements containing information on the presence or absence of certain facts of legal significance necessary for the performance of a notarial act. Examining certain provisions of notary legislation, the author concludes that there exists a presumption in the notarial process that should be understood as provisions according to which a particular fact is considered unproven if a significant violation of the notarial form is committed. Based on examples from judicial and notarial practice, it is concluded that the main task of legal regulation of the procedure of notarial proof is to create conditions for a comprehensive establishment by a notary of the circumstances that took place in the relationship between the parties to notarial proceedings in order to eliminate subjective factors associated with the peculiarities of perception of the same type of legal relationship by subjects with different levels of psychological perception.

Keywords:

notary, proofs, proving, subject of proof, limits of proof, standard of proof, principles of proof

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Библиография

Алексеев, Сергей С. 1973. Проблемы теории права: в 2 т. Т. 1. Свердловск: Свердловский юридический институт.

Боруленков, Юрий П. 2014. «Пределы доказывания как категория». Уголовное судопроизводство 3: 29–32.

Грядов, Алексей В. 2012. Доказательственная сила нотариального акта в праве России и Франции. М.: Инфотропик Медиа.

Губский, Евгений, Ф., ред. 2000. Философский энциклопедический словарь. М.: ИНФРА-М.

Клейнман, Александр Ф. 1967. Новейшие течения в советской науке процессуального права. М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та.

Коробка, Екатерина. 2021. «Должны ли стандарты доказывания быть закреплены в законе?» Адвокатская газета. Дата обращения 11 июля, 2021. https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/dolzhny-listandarty-dokazyvaniya-byt-zakrepleny-v-zakone/.

Курылев, Сергей В. 2010. Избранные труды. Краснодар: Советская Кубань.

Мусин, Валерий А. 1999. Гражданский процесс. М.: Проспект.

Осокина, Галина Л. 2008. Гражданский процесс. Общая часть. М.: Норма.

Погосян, Екатерина В. 2016. «Эволюция роли нотариуса в процессе доказывания». Нотариус 8: 19–25.

Решетникова, Ирина В. 1999. Доказательственное право Англии и США. 2-е изд. М.: Городец.

Решетникова, Ирина В. 2013. Доказывание в гражданском процессе. М.: Юрайт.

Решетникова, Ирина В., ред. 2011. Справочник по доказыванию в гражданском судопроизводстве. 5-е изд., доп. и пер. М.: Норма, Инфра-М.

Сериков Юрий, А. 2004. «Классификация презумпций в гражданском процессуальном праве». Российский ежегодник гражданского и арбитражного процесса 2: 113–127.

Фокина, Марина А. 2010. Механизм доказывания по гражданским делам: теоретико-прикладные проблемы. М.: Новый Индекс.

Шалаева, Наталья Е. 2012. «Нотариальное доказывание как основа нотариального процесса». Нотариус 1: 2–5.

Шварц, Михаил З. 2012. «Размышления о содержании и пределах доказательственного значения нотариального акта (на примере нотариально удостоверенных сделок)». Сборник материалов и статей к 10-летию Центра нотариальных исследований, 65–78. М.: Риза-Принт.

Ярков, Владимир В. 2012. Юридические факты в цивилистическом процессе. М.: Инфотропик Медиа.

Ярков, Владимир В., ред. 2017. Нотариальное право. М.: Статут.

References

Alekseev, Sergei S. 1973. Problems of the theory of law: in 2 vols. Vol. 1. Sverdlovsk, Sverdlovskii iuridicheskii institut Publ. (In Russian)

Borulenkov, Iurii P. 2014. “Limits of proof as category”. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo 3: 29–32. (In Russian)

Fokina, Marina A. 2010. Evidence mechanism in civil cases: Theoretical and applied problems. Moscow, Novyi Indeks Publ. (In Russian)

Griadov, Aleksei V. 2012. The evidentiary force of a notarial act in the law of Russia and France. Moscow, Infotropik Media Publ. (In Russian)

Gubskii Еvgenyi F. ed. 2000. Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary. Moscow, INFRA-М. (In Russian)

Iarkov, Vladimir V. 2012. Legal facts in civil process. Moscow, Infotropic-Media Publ. (In Russian)

Iarkov, Vladimir V., ed. 2017. Notarial law. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)

Kleinman, Aleksandr F. 1967. The latest trends in the Soviet science of procedural law. Moscow, Moscow University Press. (In Russian)

Korobka, Ekaterina. 2021. “Should the standards of proof be enshrined in law?” Advokatskaia gazeta. Accessed July 11, 2021. https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/dolzhny-li-standarty-dokazyvaniya-byt-zakrepleny-v-zakone/. (In Russian)

Kurylev, Sergei V. 2010. Selected works. Krasnodar, Sovetskaia Kuban’ Publ. (In Russian)

Musin, Valerii A., ed. 1999. Civil procedure. Moscow, Prospect Publ. (In Russian)

Osokina, Galina L. 2008. Civil procedure: A Basic part. Moscow, Norma Publ. (In Russian)

Pogosyan, Ekaterina V. 2016. “Evolution of the notary’s role in evidencing”. Notarius 8: 19–25. (In Russian)

Reshetnikova, Irina V. 1999. Evidence law of England and USA. 2nd ed. Moscow, Gorodets Publ. (In Russian)

Reshetnikova, Irina V. 2013. Evidencing in the civil procedure. Moscow, Iurait Publ. (In Russian)

Reshetnikova, Irina V., ed. 2011. A guide to proof in civil proceedings. 5th ed., ext. and rev. Moscow, Norma, Infra-M Publ. (In Russian)

Serikov, Iurii A. 2004. “Classification of presumptions in civil procedural law”. Rossiiskii ezhegodnik grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo protsessa 2: 113–127. (In Russian)

Shalaeva, Natal’ia E. 2021. “Notarial evidencing as the basis of notarial process”. Notarius 1: 2–5. (In Russian)

Shvarts, Mikhail Z. 2012. “Reflections on the content and limits of the evidentiary value of the notarial act(on the example pf notarized transactions)”. Sbornik materialov i statei k 10-letiiu Tsentra notarial’nykh issledovanii, 65–78. Moscow, Riza Print Publ. (In Russian)

Published

2022-05-12

How to Cite

Pogosyan, E. V. (2022). Concept and special features of proving in notarial activities. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 13(1), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.107

Issue

Section

Public and Private Law: Applied Research