Совершенствование института декларирования сведений о доходах, расходах, имуществе и обязательствах имущественного характера в условиях цифровизации

Yuri V. Truntsevskiy

doi:10.21638/spbu14.2022.204

Authors

Yuri V. Truntsevskiy Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, 34, ul. B. Cheremushkinskaya, Moscow, 117218, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.204

Abstract

The relevance of scientific research is the widespread use of systems for declaring information about state and other public persons, about their income, expenses, property and property obligations in those countries that carry out anti-corruption activities. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the expediency of improving the organization of control over the income of state and other public persons. An algorithm of actions performed using digital technologies is proposed. The program independently receives all the necessary information about a person’s property status from various official registers, and the program evaluates this information and makes one of two decisions: to stop monitoring, or to transfer the relevant information to a controlling institution, for example, to the prosecutor’s office. The main results of the study. The main problem, according to the author of the article, is that reporting on their property status is the responsibility of the declarant himself. In order to prepare such a report, a civil servant must perform many formalities (meet the deadline for submitting the declaration; fill out the document correctly; receive information from state registers, banks and other organizations in a timely manner; receive information from your husband/wife, minor children and others). For non-compliance with these requirements, the legislation provides for the legal responsibility of the declarant. The author proposed his own algorithm of control, which should be carried out for the property status of officials. The author reveals the scope of the digital program for monitoring the property status of officials. Such a program will allow not only to compare the income and expenses of officials, but also to identify violations of tax legislation, as well as legislation in the field of AML/CFT (Anti-Money Laundering/Combating the Financing of Terrorism).

Keywords:

corruption, control, declaration, property, legislation, programming

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Библиография

Баженова, Ольга И. 2016. «Об эффективности антикоррупционного механизма контроля имущественного положения должностных лиц». Конституционное и муниципальное право 12: 37–46.

Василевич, Григорий А. 2018. «Транспарентность деятельности должностных лиц как важнейшее средство исключения конфликта интересов». Журнал зарубежного законодательства и сравнительного правоведения 3: 32–37. https://doi.org/10.12737/art.2018.3.6.

Воробьева, Ольга В. 2017. «Технология автоматизации сбора сведений и мониторинга доходов госслужащих». Интеллектуальные информационные системы: тенденции, проблемы, перспективы. Материалы докладов IV региональной заочной научно-практической конференции «ИИС-2016», 40–44. Курск: Университетская книга.

Голоманчук, Эйда В., Татьяна Ю. Яготинцева, Ольга А. Астафурова. 2019. «Некоторые проблемы предоставления сведений о доходах, расходах, об имуществе и обязательствах имущественного характера государственными гражданскими служащими и пути их решения». Бизнес. Образование. Право 3: 249–254. https://doi.org/10.25683/VOLBI.2019.48.334.

Грипич, Сергей А. 2021. «Правовые аспекты внедрения цифровых технологий в государственное управление». Государственная власть и местное самоуправление 2: 47–50. https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1247-2021-2-47-50.

Зайцева, Галина. 2021. «Подаем справки о доходах, расходах, имуществе и обязательствах за 2020 год». Казенные учреждения: бухгалтерский учет и налогообложение 4: 38–47.

Севальнев, Вячеслав В., Артем М. Цирин. 2018. «Опыт лучших практик государственной службы Китая и России». Журнал зарубежного законодательства и сравнительного правоведения 6: 153–159. https://doi.org/10.12737/art.2018.6.18.

Трунцевский, Юрий В. 2020. «Дисциплинарная и судебная практика по делам об увольнении за коррупционное правонарушение в связи с утратой доверия». Журнал российского права 11: 155–173. https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2020.139.

Чела, Блерта. 2018. «Является ли е-декларирование панацеей от коррупции». Новое время. Дата обращения 5 июля, 2021. https://biz.nv.ua/experts/est-li-elektronnoe-deklarirovanie-panatseej-otkorruptsii-2490661.html.

Gokcekus, Omer, Yui Suzuki. 2014. “Is there a corruption-effect on conspicuous consumption?” The Journal of Applied Economic Research 8 (3): 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973801014531135.

Mukherjee, Ranjana, Omer Gokcekus. 2006. “Officials’ asset declaration laws: Do they prevent corruption?” Global Corruption Report. Corruption and Health. Ed. by Robin Hodess, Toby Wolfe, 326–327. Ann Arbor: Transparency International.

Quiner, Mark. 2021. “Ethics and public corruption laws: Penalties”. NCLS. Дата обращения 5 июля, 2021. https://www.ncsl.org/research/ethics/50-state-chart-criminal-penalties-for-public-corr.aspx.

References

Bazhenova, Ol’ga I. 2016. “Effectiveness of anti-corruption control over property status of officials”. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo 12: 37–46. (In Russian)

Chela, Blerta. 2018. “Is e-declaration a panacea for corruption”. Novoe vremia. Accessed July 5, 2021. https://biz.nv.ua/experts/est-li-elektronnoe-deklarirovanie-panatseej-ot-korruptsii-2490661.html. (In Russian)

Gokcekus, Omer, Yui Suzuki. 2014. “Is there a corruption-effect on conspicuous consumption?” The Journal of Applied Economic Research 8 (3): 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973801014531135.

Golomanchuk, Eida V., Tat’iana Iu. Iagotintseva, Ol’ga A. Astafurova. 2019. “Some problems of providing information about income, expenditure, property and property obligations by the state civil officers and the ways of their settlement”. Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo 3: 249–254. https://doi.org/10.25683/VOLBI. 2019.48.334. (In Russian)

Gripich, Sergei A. 2021. “Legal aspects of the introduction of digital technologies in public administration”. Gosudarstvennaia vlast’ i mestnoe samoupravlenie 2: 47–50. https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1247-2021-2-47-50. (In Russian)

Mukherjee, Ranjana, Omer Gokcekus. 2006. “Officials’ asset declaration laws: Do they prevent corruption?” Global Corruption Report. Corruption and Health. Ed. by Robin Hodess, Toby Wolfe, 326–327. Ann Arbor, Transparency International.

Quiner, Mark. 2021. “Ethics and public corruption laws: Penalties”. NCLS. Accessed July 5, 2021. https://www.ncsl.org/research/ethics/50-state-chart-criminal-penalties-for-public-corr.aspx.

Seval’nev, Viacheslav V., Artem M. Tsirin. 2018. “Experience of the best practices of public service of China and Russia”. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniia 6: 153–159. https://doi.org/10.12737/art.2018.6.18. (In Russian)

Truntsevskiy, Yuri V. 2020. “Disciplinary and judicial practice in cases on dismissal for a corruption offense due to loss of trust”. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava 11: 155–173. https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2020.139. (In Russian)

Vasilevich, Grigorii A. 2018. “Transparency of activities of officers as the most important mean for exclusion of conflict of interest”. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniia 3: 32–37. https://doi.org/10.12737/art.2018.3.6. (In Russian)

Vorob’eva, Olga V. 2017. “Technology of automation of data collection and monitoring of income of civil servants”. Intellektual’nye informatsionnye sistemy: tendentsii, problemy, perspektivy. Materialy dokladov IV regional’noi zaochnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii “IIS-2016”, 40–44. Kursk, Universitetskaia kniga Publ. (In Russian)

Zaitseva, Galina. 2021. “We submit certificates of income, expenses, property and obligations for 2020”. Kazennye uchrezhdeniia: bukhgalterskii uchet i nalogooblozhenie 4: 38–47. (In Russian)