Specific performance and damages in Anglo-American and сontinental law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.212Abstract
The article deals with moral and ethical factors of contract law influencing the choice between specific performance and damages as the main remedy. Development of the law of contracts depends on decision of three dilemmas: “deontology or utilitarianism”; “will theory or objective theory”; “pacta sunt servanda principle or its denial”. In the course of protection of the contractual interest the law of contracts tends to right-based or economic theory depending on decision of the dilemmas mentioned. The economic theory gives priority to claim for damages whereas the right-based theory to specific performance. The article reveals reasons why specific performance is not popular in the USA as well as examines specific performance as an equitable remedy. The subsidiary role of specific performance to damages is additionally disclosed with regard to the adequacy of damages criterion which has not yet been followed in continental law. The continental legal system determined balance between specific performance and damages on the basis of Roman legal procedure (cognitio extraordinaria), in operation during the post-classical period as well as the results of Roman law intellectualization represented by the doctrine of interest (F. Mommsen) whereby the creditor`s interest replaced by its equivalent after breach of contract. The aggrieved party is entitled to choose between damages or specific performance with a preliminary letter of formal notice (France, Germany) or without it (Russia).
Keywords:
pacta sunt servanda, damages, deontology, utilitarianism, equitable remedies, objective theory
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Библиография
Белых, Владимир С. 2017. Договорное право Англии: сравнительно-правовое исследование. М.: Проспект.
Брагинский, Михаил И., Василий В. Витрянский. 2005. Договорное право. Кн. 1: Общие положения. 2-е изд. М.: Статут.
Василевская, Людмила Ю. 2018. «Возмещение убытков и потерь в российском и зарубежном праве: общее и особенное в правовой регламентации». Реформа обязательственного права России: проблемы и перспективы. Отв. ред. Елена Е. Богданова, 118–158. М.: Проспект.
Громов, Андрей А. 2016. «Переход от исполнения обязательства в натуре к возмещению убытков: российское и германское регулирование». Вестник гражданского права 1: 7–46.
Карапетов, Артем Г. 2006. «Соотношение требования о взыскании убытков с иными средствами защиты прав кредитора». Убытки и практика их возмещения. Отв. ред. Марина А. Рожкова, 202–277. М.: Статут.
Кофанов, Леонид Л., ред. 2002. Дигесты Юстиниана. В 8 т., т. 1. М.: Статут.
Маковский, Александр Л. 2010. О кодификации гражданского права (1922–2006). М.: Статут.
Покровский, Иосиф А. 1917. История римского права. 3-е изд., испр. и доп. Пг.: Изд. Юридического книжного склада «Право».
Расснер, Д., пер. 1888. Институции Гая. Ч. 4. СПб.: Тип. М. М. Стасюлевича.
Халфина, Раиса О. 1959. Договор в английском гражданском праве. М.: Издательство Академии наук СССР.
Цвайгерт, Конрад, Хайн Кётц. 2010. Сравнительное частное право. М.: Международные отношения.
Arbel, Yonathan A. 2015. “Contract remedies in action: Specific performance”. West Virginia Law Review 118 (1): 369–410.
Atiyah, Patrick S. 1978. “Contracts, promises and the law of obligations”. Law Quarterly Review 94: 193–223.
Barnett, Randy E. 1992. “Some problems with contract as promise”. Cornell Law Review 77: 1022–1033.
Barnett, Randy E. 2012. “Contract is not promise; Contract is consent”. Suffolk University Law Review XLV(3): 647–665.
Bentham, Jeremy. 1823. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Vol. 1. London: Printed for W. Pickering.
Buckland, William W. 1911. Equity in Roman Law. London: University of London.
Farnsworth, Edward A. 1970. “Legal remedies for breach of contract”. Columbia Law Review 70: 1145–1216.
Fried, Charles A. 1981. Contract as promise: A theory of contractual obligation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Fried, Charles A. 2012. “Contract as promise thirty years on”. Suffolk University Law Review 45 (3): 961–978.
Fry, Edward. 1884. A treatise on the specific performance of contracts. New York: Albany, N. Y., W. C. Little.
Fuller, Lon L., William R. Perdue. 1936. “The reliance interest in contract damages”. Yale Law Journal 1 (46): 52–96.
Holmes, Oliver W. Jr. 1881. The common law. London: Macmillan & Co. London.
Huston, Charles A. 1915. The enforcement of decrees in equity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hyland, Richard. 1994. “Pacta sunt servanda: A meditation”. Virginia Journal of International Law 34 (2): 405–433.
Kant, Immanuel. 1785. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Riga: J. F. Hartknoch.
Kirchmann, Julius H. 1870. Immanuel Kant’s Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Die Metaphysik der Sitten. Erster Theil. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre. Berlin: L. Heimann.
Kronman, Anthony T. 1978. “Specific performance”. University of Chicago Law Review 45 (2): 351–382.
Ludes, Francis J., Harold J. Gilbert. 1953. “Corpus juris secundum”. A complete restatement of the entire American Law as developed by all reported cases. Vol. LXXXI, 403–817. Brooklyn, New York: American Law Book Co.
Mill, John S. 1863. Utilitarianism. London: Parker, Son, and Bourn, West Strand.
Mill, John S. 2001. On liberty. 1859. Kitchener: Batoche Books.
Mommsen, Friedrich. 1855. Beiträge zum Obligationenrecht. 2, Zur Lehre von dem Interesse. Braunschweig: Schwetschke
Parry, David H. 1959. The sanctity of contracts in English law. London: Stevens & Sons Ltd.
Paton, George W. 1946. A textbook of jurisprudence. London: Oxford University Press.
Pothier, Robert J. 1768. Traité des obligations selon les règles tant du for de la conscience que du for extérieur. T. 1. Paris: Debure l’aîné; Orléans: J. Rouzeau-Montaut.
Schwartz, Alan. 1979. “The case for specific performance”. The Yale Law Journal 89 (2): 271–307.
Ulen, Thomas S. 1984. “The efficiency of specific performance: Toward a unified theory of contract remedies”. Michigan Law Review 83 (2): 341–401.
Wallinga, Tammo. 2011. “The common history of European legal scholarship”. Erasmus Law Review 4 (1): 3–20.
Wehberg, Hans. 1959. “Pacta sunt servanda”. The American Journal of International Law 53 (4): 775–786.
Willis, Hugh E. 1915. “Anomalous growth of the common law — The Anglo-American quest for justice”. California Law Review 3 (2): 103–121.
References
Arbel, Yonathan A. 2015. “Contract remedies in action: Specific performance”. West Virginia Law Review 118 (1): 369–410.
Atiyah, Patrick S. 1978. “Contracts, promises and the law of obligations”. Law Quarterly Review 94: 193–223.
Barnett, Randy E. 1992. “Some problems with contract as promise”. Cornell Law Review 77: 1022–1033.
Barnett, Randy E. 2012. “Contract is not promise; Contract is consent”. Suffolk University Law Review XLV(3): 647–665.
Belykh, Vladimir S. 2017. Contract Law in England: a comparative legal study. Moscow, Prospekt Publ.(In Russian)
Bentham, Jeremy. 1823. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Vol. 1. London, Printed for W. Pickering.
Braginskii, Mikhail I., Vasilii V. Vitrianskii. 2005. Contract law. Book 1: General Provisions. 2nd ed. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Buckland, William W. 1911. Equity in Roman Law. London, University of London.
Farnsworth, Edward A. 1970. “Legal remedies for breach of contract”. Columbia Law Review 70: 1145–1216.
Fried, Charles A. 1981. Contract as promise: A theory of contractual obligation. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Fried, Charles A. 2012. “Contract as promise thirty years on”. Suffolk University Law Review 45 (3): 961–978.
Fry, Edward. 1884. A treatise on the specific performance of contracts. New York, Albany, N. Y., W. C. Little.
Fuller, Lon L., William R. Perdue. 1936. “The reliance interest in contract damages”. Yale Law Journal 1 (46): 52–96.
Gromov, Andrei A. 2016. “The transformation from the claim for specific performance to the claim for damages: The Russian and German regulations”. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava 1: 7–46. (In Russian)
Holmes, Oliver W. Jr. 1881. The common law. London, Macmillan & Co. London.
Huston, Charles A. 1915. The enforcement of decrees in equity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hyland, Richard. 1994. “Pacta sunt servanda: A meditation”. Virginia Journal of International Law 34 (2): 405–433.
Kant, Immanuel. 1785. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Riga, J. F. Hartknoch.
Karapetov, Artem G. 2006. “Damages claims compared with other remedies available to the creditor”. Ubytki i praktika ikh vozmeshcheniia. Ed. by Marina A. Rozhkova, 202–277. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Kirchmann, Julius H. 1870. Immanuel Kant’s Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Die Metaphysik der Sitten. Erster Theil. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre. Berlin, L. Heimann.
Khalfina, Raisa O. 1959. Contract in English civil law. Мoscow, Akademiia nauk SSSR Publ. (In Russian)
Kofanov, Leonid L., ed. 2002. Digests of Justinian. Rus. ed. In 8 vols, vol. 1. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Kronman, Anthony T. 1978. “Specific performance”. University of Chicago Law Review 45 (2): 351–382.
Ludes, Francis J., Harold J. Gilbert. 1953. “Corpus juris secundum”. A complete restatement of the entire American Law as developed by all reported cases. Vol. LXXXI, 403–817. Brooklyn, New York, American Law Book Co.
Makovskii, Aleksandr L. 2010. On codification of civil law. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)
Mill, John S. 1863. Utilitarianism. London, Parker, Son, and Bourn, West Strand.
Mill, John S. 2001. On liberty. 1859. Kitchener, Batoche Books.
Mommsen, Friedrich. 1855. Beiträge zum Obligationenrecht. 2, Zur Lehre von dem Interesse. Braunschweig, Schwetschke
Parry, David H. 1959. The sanctity of contracts in English law. London, Stevens & Sons Ltd.
Paton, George W. 1946. A textbook of jurisprudence. London, Oxford University Press.
Pokrovskii, Iosif A. 1917. The history of Roman Law. 3rd ed., rev. and enl. Petrograd, Izdanie Iuridicheskogo knizhnogo sklada “Pravo” Publ. (In Russian)
Pothier, Robert J. 1768. Traité des obligations selon les règles tant du for de la conscience que du for extérieur. T. 1. Paris, Debure l’aîné; Orléans, J. Rouzeau-Montaut.
Rassner, D., transl. 1888. The Institutes of Gaius. Part IV. St. Petersburg, M. M. Stasiulevich Publ. (In Russian)
Schwartz, Alan. 1979. “The case for specific performance”. The Yale Law Journal 89 (2): 271–307.
Ulen, Thomas S. 1984. “The efficiency of specific performance: Toward a unified theory of contract remedies”. Michigan Law Review 83 (2): 341–401.
Vasilevskaia, Liudmila Iu. 2018. “Compensation of damages and losses in Russian and foreign law: Similar and peculiar in legal regulation”. Reforma obiazatel’stvennogo prava Rossii: problemy i perspektivy. Ed. by Elena E. Bogdanova, 118–158. Moscow, Prospekt Publ. (In Russian)
Wallinga, Tammo. 2011. “The common history of European legal scholarship”. Erasmus Law Review 4 (1): 3–20.
Wehberg, Hans. 1959. “Pacta sunt servanda”. The American Journal of International Law 53 (4): 775–786.
Willis, Hugh E. 1915. “Anomalous growth of the common law — The Anglo-American quest for justice”. California Law Review 3 (2): 103–121.
Downloads
Published
2023-05-11
How to Cite
Torkin, D. A. (2023). Specific performance and damages in Anglo-American and сontinental law. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 14(2), 474–491. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.212
Issue
Section
Comparative Law
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
