Post-prison resocialization - myth or reality?

Авторы

  • Roman A. Romashov St. Petersburg Humanitarian University of Trade Unions, 15, ul. Fuchika, St. Petersburg, 192102, Russian Federation, Institute of Economics and Law of Petrozavodsk State University, 33, pr. Lenina, Petrozavodsk, 185910, Republic of Karelia, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9777-8625
  • Elena A. Bryleva Perm Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, 125, Karpinsky ul., Perm, 614012, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5596-2317

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.414

Аннотация

In this article, the authors draw attention to the consistently high growth of recidivism among those who returned from prison. The reasons for this are insufficiently effective re-socialization activities, while the authors point out that the activities of the Federal Penitentiary Service in prisons during the prison period are currently the most streamlined both in terms of regulatory legal support and in technical and legal terms. The main problems arise for convicts upon returning from prison, which is associated with the loss of social ties; difficulties in finding a job, while the state represented by authorized bodies and officials, in fact, distances itself from the process of post-prison resocialization. The authors in the process of the study point out the following issues that need to be resolved both at the legislative and administrative levels: the formation of common approaches in defining the concept of “resocialization”, “probation”, as well as in developing common requirements and standards in the field of post-prison resocialization. The authors conclude the need for an integrated approach to the re-socialization of convicts with the involvement of civil society institutions and refer to the historical past of the Russian Empire, in particular, patronage societies that are quite effective at that time. The authors have noted positive examples of concrete practical assistance to people who have returned from places of detention, in particular such organizations are the Center for the Promotion of Criminal Justice Reform.

Ключевые слова:

resocialization, convicts, Federal Penitentiary Service, state, civil society, societies patronage

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
 

Библиографические ссылки

References

Borovitinov, Mikhail M. 1908. Lectures on criminal law, Comp. A. I. Krasovsky. St. Petersburg. (In Russian)

Parygin, Boris D. 1971. Fundamentals of social — psychological theory. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

Romashov, Roman A., Arbuzova, Svetlana A. 2013. “Regulatory and legal foundations and law instruments

for penal resocialisation”. Vestnik Vladimirskogo iuridicheskogo instituta 4 (29): 46–52. (In Russian)

Sergeev, Danil N. 2013. “Is a probation law necessary?” Iuridicheskaia nauka i pravookhranitel’naia praktika 3(25): 68–72. (In Russian)

Varentsova, Larisa Y., Varentsov, Sergey Y. 2011. “From the History Nizhny Novgorod Provincial Guardianship of Prisons Committee in the 19th — the beginning of 20th century”. Izvestiia vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Povolzhskii region. Gumanitarnye nauki 3 (19): 12–18. (In Russian)

Загрузки

Опубликован

03.12.2019

Как цитировать

Romashov, R. A., & Bryleva, E. A. (2019). Post-prison resocialization - myth or reality?. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Право, 10(4), 827–835. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.414

Выпуск

Раздел

Правовая жизнь: научно-практические заключения, комментарии и обзоры