The legal nature of pre-insolvency proceedings under Russian and European law

Авторы

  • Larisa Mastilovich St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4865-7725

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2021.212

Аннотация

The article provides a critical analysis of bankruptcy prevention procedures in the context of interactions between the principle of self-regulation (interaction between free legal will of creditors and the debtor) and the principle “cross-class cram-down” (the right of a court to prevail over the principle of self-regulation). The judicial authority, within the framework of European preventive restructuring law, has the absolute right to discretionally decide on any issue if it is approved by the debtor (freedom of entrepreneurial activity is guaranteed to every solvent debtor). Interference in the business of the solvent and insolvent debtor by judicial authority is not allowed in any other procedures including traditional insolvency court procedures (the majority of creditors are empowered to make decisions). In all legal orders, the traditional insolvency court procedures prioritize the principle of “majority of creditors” to the principle of self-regulation in contrast to European preventive restructuring procedures, where the principle of self-regulation dominates. Therefore, European preventive restructuring cannot be unambiguously attributed to either a civil law legal nature or a bankruptcy law legal nature. In Russia pre-insolvency procedures represent only the civil law legal nature during all procedure. The author introduces new pre-bankruptcy terms: “normative legal collectivity” — mandatory distribution of consequences to all parties, “actual collectivity” — the voluntary consent of all creditors in a particular case and “regulatory actual collectivity” — the requirements for voluntary consent of all creditors. The final result of the European preventive restructuring procedure is unknown until the very end (the same for traditional insolvency court procedures), while according to Art. 31 of the Bankruptcy Law Act of the Russian Federation, the result is fully known from the beginning where it works according to the principle: “either everything and immediately, or nothing”.

Ключевые слова:

insolvency, legal nature, reorganization, pre-insolvency proceedings, bankruptcy prevention, preventive restructuring

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
 

Библиографические ссылки

References

Anokhin, Vladislav S. 2006. “Prevention of bankruptcy and an attempt to return the solvency of an insolvent debtor”. Khoziaistvo i pravo: priloznenie 1: 1–48. (In Russian)

De Weijs, Rolef, Meren Baltjes. 2018. “Opening the door for the opportunistic use of interim financing: A critical assessment of the eu draft directive on preventive restructuring frameworks” International Insolvency Review 27 (2): 223–254.

Eidenmüller, Horst. 2018. “What is an Insolvency proceeding”. American Bankruptcy Law Journal 1: 53–71.

Garašić, Jasnica. 2017. “Najznačajne novine Stečajnog zakona iz 2015. godine”. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta Rijeka 1 (38): 131–184.

Kutufà, Ilaria. 2018. “The Financial distress of individual debtors: Points for a de jure condendo reflection from a comparatie perspective”. European Journal of Legal Studies 11 (1): 67–96.

Mastilovic, Larisa. 2020. “La tutela europea dei diritti dei lavoratori nelle procedure di ristrutturazione preventiva in materia fallimentare e il confronto con la disciplina dell’insolvenza in Croazia, Serbia e Russia”. Il diritto del mercato del lavoro 2: 425–443.

Mastilovich, Larisa. 2020. “Out-of court preventive rehabilitation agreement as a method for preventing the occurrence of legal signs of bankruptcy”. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo 1: 140–153. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2020.110.

Popondopulo, Vladimir F. 2003. Commentary on the Federal Law on Insolvency (Bankruptcy). Moscow, Omega Publ. (In Russian)

Popondopulo, Vladimir F. 2009. “Contract as a means of private law regulation”. Pravovedenie. Izvestiia vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii 4 (285): 137–151. (In Russian)

Shershenevich, Gabriel F. 2003. Commercial Law Course: Commercial Process. Concorsual process. Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)

Stefanishina, Svetlana V. 2018. “The status of third parties in the implementation of their pre-trial reorganization in bankruptcy”. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 2 (24): 309–312.

Tiuleneva, Tat’iana A. 2017. Accounting and analysis of bankruptcies: a tutorial. Kemerevo, Kuzbasskii gosudarstvennyi tekhnicheskii universitet imeni T. F. Gorbacheva Publ. (In Russian)

Tollenaar, Nicolaes W. A. 2017. “The European Commission’s Proposal for a Directive on Preventive Restructuring Proceedings”. Insolvency Intelligence 5 (30): 65–81.

Vitrianskii, Vasilii V. 2010. “Some basic provisions of the concept of development of civil legislation of the Russian Federation on obligations”. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava 1: 13–25.

Vitrianskii, Vasilii V., ed. 2000. Commentary on the Federal Law on Insolvency (Bankruptcy). Moscow, Statut Publ. (In Russian)

Westbrook, Jay Lawrence, Charles D. Booth, Christoph G. Paulus, Harry Rayak. 2010. A Global View of business insolvency System. Washington, DC, World Bank.

Zhukova, Tat’iana M., Kseniia S. Kondrat’eva. 2012. “Improving the order of legal regulation of sanctions as a way to ensure the financial stability of the debtor”. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Iuridicheskie nauki 3 (17): 101–106.

Загрузки

Опубликован

05.07.2021

Как цитировать

Mastilovich, L. (2021). The legal nature of pre-insolvency proceedings under Russian and European law. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Право, 12(2), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2021.212

Выпуск

Раздел

Сравнительное право