Single point of entry doctrine in the United States as a form of corporate liability: Рossibilities of legal adoption in the Russian Federation

Аннотация

The article analyzes various aspects of the single point of entry bank resolution strategy in the United States and seeks to determine the viability of legally adopting this approach in the Russian Federation. The single point of entry strategy provides an alternative to “bailing out” large bank groups and bankruptcy proceedings via controlled liquidation of the parent company with simultaneous financial rehabilitation of the subsidiary bank. Orderly Liquidation Authority detailed by Title II of the Dodd-Frank Act provides a legislative framework for the single point of entry strategy, but due to the doctrine only existing as a guideline and not directly regulated by legislation, there are several gaps in legislation that cause various problems in both the practical implementation of the single point of entry doctrine and its scientific evaluation. The insufficiently studied topic of single point of entry doctrine as a form of corporate liability is also examined in the article. Russian legislation and court practices regarding bank rehabilitation and the doctrine of “piercing the corporate veil” are examined to determine the possibility of legally adopting the single point of entry doctrine due to similarities between doctrines. The flaws and merits of the single point of entry doctrine are studied while accounting for potential ways to overcome the legal gaps in the strategy. The article reaches the conclusion that while the single point of entry doctrine is far from perfect, the basic principles can be applied to Russian legislation and serve as a viable alternative to the prevalent “bailout” practice.

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
 

Литература

References

Gelpern, Anna, Nicolas Vernon. 2019. “An Effective Regime for Non-viable Banks: U. S. Experience and Considerations for EU Reform”. Economic Governance Support Unit (EGOV) Directorate-General for Internal Policies of the Union PE 624.432 — July 2019. Accessed September 16, 2019. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2019/624432/IPOL_STU(2019)624432_EN.pdf.

Isaeva, Ekaterina, Iulia Sharmok. 2016. “Development of innovative methods for the prevention of the bankruptcy of credit organization in Russia”. Internet-zhurnal “Naukovedenie”. Accessed September 16, 2019. http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/razvitie-innovatsionnyh-metodov-predotvrascheniya-bankrotstva-kreditnyh-organizatsiy-v-rossii. (In Russian)

Kholiavko, Anna, Dar’ia Borisiak. 2017. “Central bank is ready to impose sanction on new big banks”. Vedomosti. Accessed September 16, 2019. https://www.vedomosti.ru/finance/articles/2017/11/08/740856-tsentrobank-sanatsiyu-banki. (In Russian)

Kupiec, Paul, Peter Wallison. 2015. “Can the “Single Point of Entry” strategy be used to recapitalize a systemically important failing bank?” Journal of Financial Stability 20 (C): 184–197.

Ramazanov, Timur G. 2012. “The implementation by the Bank of Russia and state corporations of measures to prevent the bankruptcy of commercial banks”. Cyberleninka. Accessed September 16, 2019. http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/realizatsiya-bankom-rossii-gosudarstvennymi-korporatsiyamimeropriyatiy-po-preduprezhdeniyu-bankrotstva-kommercheskih-bankov. (In Russian)

Ruchkina, Gulnara. F. 2018 “Implementation of a new mechanism for the rehabilitation of banks: legal and organizational aspects”. Bankovskoe pravo 1: 7–17. Accessed September 16, 2019. http://elib.fa.ru/art2018/bv777.pdf. (In Russian)

Shevchenko, Galina N. 2016. “Novels of the Russian civil legislation devoted to ‘piercing the corporate veil’”. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Ser. Pravo 1 (46): 102–108. (In Russian)

Shitkina, Irina. 2013. “Lifting corporate veil in Russian law: Legal regulation and practice”. Khoziaistvo i pravo 2 (433): 3–25. (In Russian)

Simmons, Rebecca. 2014. Banking Perspective, Quarter 1, 2014 Single Point of Entry: A Strategy to Resolve Large and Complex Financial Companies. Accessed September 16, 2019. https://www.theclearinghouse.org/banking-perspectives/2014/2014-q1-banking-perspectives/articles/single-point-of-entry.

Skeel, David A. Jr. 2014. “Single Point of Entry and the Bankruptcy Alternative”. Martin Across the Great Divide: New Perspectives on the Financial Crisis, eds Neil Baily, John B. Taylor, 311–333. Stanford, Hoover Institution, Stanford University.

Skeel, David A. Jr. 2015. The New Synthesis of Bank Regulation and Bankruptcy in the Dodd-Frank Era. Research Paper. University of Pennsylvania.

Spirina, Tatiana. 2014. “‘Piercing the corporate veil’ through the mechanism of bringing to subsidiary liability in the framework of the bankruptcy case”. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Iuridicheskie nauki 1 (23): 64–72.

Tarasenko, Olga. 2016. “Bankruptcy of banking organizations: features and problems of legal regulation”. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava 8 (69): 84–95. (In Russian)

Yulova, Ekaterina. 2004. “Regulation of insolvency (bankruptcy) of credit organizations”. PhD diss., Moskovskaia akademiia ekonomiki i prava. (In Russian)

Опубликован
2021-01-18
Как цитировать
Kobenia, R. R. (2021). Single point of entry doctrine in the United States as a form of corporate liability: Рossibilities of legal adoption in the Russian Federation. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Право, 11(4), 1022-1034. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2020.412
Раздел
Сравнительное право