Challenges of holding the presidents of general jurisdiction courts liable to disciplinary measures and termination of their powers in the Russian Federation

Авторы

  • Yaroslav B. Zholobov North-Western Branch of the Russian State University of Justice, 5, Alexandrovsky Park, St. Petersburg, 197046, Russian Federation
  • Viktor N. Kornev Russian State University of Justice, 69, ul. Novocheryomushkinskaya, Moscow, 117418, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.405

Аннотация

The article examines the challenges of holding the presidents of general jurisdiction courts liable to disciplinary measures and issues of terminating their powers. It is shown that the legal status of the presidents of general jurisdiction courts encompasses various elements, such as the procedure for terminating their powers, their liability, the procedure for replacing their post, their competence, and guarantees of independence. Five cases of termination of the powers of the president of a general jurisdiction court were considered: automatic suspension in the event of termination or suspension of powers as a judge, which may be directly tied to disciplinary proceedings, limitation of an office term, voluntary rejection of the position while retaining the powers of a judge, early termination of the court president’s powers while maintaining his/her position as judge for failure to fulfill or inadequately fulfill his/her official duties, commission of an act defaming the honor and dignity of a judge, as well as in any other circumstances specified under federal constitutional law indicating the inability of a judge to perform his/her duties. Significant gaps in matters of early termination of the court presidents’ powers are evident in Russian judicial practice, as demonstrated by numerous examples. The matters concerning the disciplinary liability of the presidents of general jurisdiction courts are analyzed with respect to the procedures, grounds and peculiarities for holding both judges and court presidents liable. A practical view of the modern interpretation of the concept “disciplinary offense of a judge” is shown. Recommendations have been made to improve the Russian legislation that deals with the issues of disciplinary liability of the presidents of general jurisdiction courts and termination of their powers, with a focus on the Law of the Russian Federation on the Status of Judges in the Russian Federation of 1992.

Ключевые слова:

general jurisdiction courts, court president, elements of legal status, termination of powers, early termination of powers, voluntary rejection of a position, disciplinary offense of a judge, disciplinary liability

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
 

Библиографические ссылки

References

Ermoshin, Grigorii T. 2016. “The status of a judge in the Russian Federation”. Dr. Sci. Thesis in Law, Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi universitet pravosudiia. (In Russian)

Ermoshin, Grigorii T. 2017. “Development of constitutional principles of judiciary autonomy and judge independence at the present stage of judicial reform”. Rossiiskii sud’ia 1: 44–48. (In Russian)

Khabrieva, Taliia Ia., Iurii A. Tikhomirov, eds. 2015. Scientific concepts of the Russian legislation development. Moscow, Iurisprudentsiia Publ. (In Russian)

Kleandrov, Mikhail I. 2018. “On the defectiveness of the formula of a disciplinary offence of a Russian judge”. Journal of Russian Law 4 (256): 110–121. (In Russian)

Koroleva, Elena V. 2021. “Early termination of authorities of the presiding judge of a court by the federation council upon a recommendation of the president of the Russian Federation”. Rossiiskii sud’ia 10: 45–48. (In Russian)

Mashkina, Tamara I., Natal’ia A. Morozova. 2003. “Legal nature of the qualification boards of judges”. Rossiiskaia iustitsiia 12: 20–22. (In Russian)

Tuganov, Iurii N., Vladimir K. Aulov, Sergei Iu. Nekrasov. 2017. “Disciplinary liability of judges”. Izvestiia Baikal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 27 (2): 211–217. (In Russian)

Vasiagina, Marina M. 2016. “Problems of the institution of the right of a judge to resign as a guarantee of the independence of judges”. Novaia nauka: Sovremennoe sostoianie i puti razvitiia 12 (4): 159–162.(In Russian)

Загрузки

Опубликован

14.12.2023

Как цитировать

Zholobov, Y. B., & Kornev, V. N. (2023). Challenges of holding the presidents of general jurisdiction courts liable to disciplinary measures and termination of their powers in the Russian Federation. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Право, 14(4), 905–921. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.405

Выпуск

Раздел

Публичное и частное право: прикладные исследования