Private pensions funds in North Macedonia and Russia

Авторы

  • Marija Ampovska University Goce Delchev in Shtip, 10-A P. O., Box 201, Krste Misirkov, Shtip, 2000, Republic of North Macedonia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9147-5890
  • Elena V. Kilinkarova St Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1262-1448
  • Kristina Misheva University Goce Delchev in Shtip, 10-A P. O., Box 201, Krste Misirkov, Shtip, 2000, Republic of North Macedonia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2327-7358
  • Fatima K. Nogaylieva St Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1686-7739
  • Maria D. Polenchuk St Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.309

Аннотация

The article focuses on the reform of the pension systems in North Macedonia and Russia, which resulted in switch from one-pillar to multi-pillar pension systems, and current legal and institutional architecture in both legal systems with emphasis on private pension funds which are widely recognized as the core drivers for the improvement of the living standards of retirees. The article starts with the general overview of Macedonian and Russian pension systems which provides the necessary background for understanding of the legal regime of private pension funds. The general overview of the pension systems is followed by the detailed analysis of the legal status of private pension funds in both countries, with more attention being paid to the experience of North Macedonia where private pension funds play a more important role in the pension system. In Russia private pension funds have shown their positive effect, but their coverage in general is still moderate. The overview of general rules of taxation of contributions to private pension funds and pensions concludes the article. The comparative research allowed to make the conclusion that both countries have made different progress in moving to a three-pillar pension system especially from the viewpoint of the established legal and institutional framework, and the establishment and operation of the private funds, both mandatory and voluntary.

Ключевые слова:

pension system, mandatory pension, fully funded pension, voluntary pension, private pension funds, pension benefits, insurance contributions, taxation

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
 

Библиографические ссылки

References

Borda, Marta, Natalia Grishchenko, Patrycja Kowalczyk-Rolczynska. 2017. “Pension reforms in Poland and Russia: Mid-term experiences from the participants’ perspective”. Rozprawy Ubezpieczeniowe 25 (3): 48–63.

Bornarova, Suzana, Natasha Bogoevska, Svetlana Trbojevikj. 2013. “Pension system reforms in the Republic of Macedonia: Expected benefits and challenges”. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 2 (9): 393–399.

Fultz, Elaine, Kenichi Hirose. 2018. Second-pillar pension re-reforms in Bulgaria, Croatia, Estonia, Latvia, Macedonia, Romania, and Slovakia. Geneva, International Labour Organization.

Galev, Gale, Jadranka Dabovikj Anastasovska. 2018. Law of obligations. Skopje, Faculty of Law Iustinianus Prumis Skopje.

Grishchenko, Natalia. 2016. “Pensions after pension reforms: A comparative analysis of Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Russia”. Procedia Economics and Finance 36: 3–9.

Misheva, Kristina, Marija Ampovska, Biljana Todorova. 2019. “Challenges and opportunities of the Macedonian pension system according the EU Recommendations (Social, legal and financial aspects)”. EU and comparative law issues and challenges series (ECLIC 3), 988–1007. Osijek, University Josip Juraj Strossmayer of Osijek.

Mustafai, Habil. 2017. “Pension system reform in the Republic of Macedonia”. International Refereed Scientific Journal Vision 2 (1): 69–78.

Patoska, Aleksandra, Branko Dimeski. 2015. “Pension system reforms in Macedonia: Causes, conditions and benefits”. Journal of International Scientific Publications 9: 478–486.

Pudovkin, Aleksey. 2016. “World experience of using the voluntary and mandatory funded pension systems: Lessons for Russia”. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta 3 (48): 258–264. (In Russian)

Roik, Valentin. 2015. “Architecture of pension institutions in Russia: state and prospects”. Journal of New Economic Association 3: 184–188.

Vasilyeva, Julia, Svetlana Shuraleva. 2018. “About the formation and current state of the paradigms of Russian labor law and social security law”. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Iuridicheskie nauki 41: 454–477. (In Russian)

Загрузки

Опубликован

22.09.2022

Как цитировать

Ampovska, M., Kilinkarova, E. V., Misheva, K., Nogaylieva, F. K., & Polenchuk, M. D. (2022). Private pensions funds in North Macedonia and Russia. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Право, 13(3), 725–739. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.309

Выпуск

Раздел

Сравнительное право

Наиболее читаемые статьи этого автора (авторов)